15 december 2017 kl 06:38
Redigerad 15 december 2017 kl 07:07
a)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21751854"we conclude that uneven grass surface results in greater haemolysis compared to asphalt road"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19346972"Greater running intensities incur more inflammation and hemolysis, but these variables were not affected by the surface type trained upon."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22843041"There were no differences in 24 hours postexercise performance (p > 0.05), and blood markers of muscle damage, inflammation and hemolysis were also similar between the surfaces (p > 0.05). These results suggest that performing a sport-specific conditioning session on a sand (vs. grass) surface can result in a greater physiological response, without any additional decrement to next-day performance."
b)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21651826"Our results indicate that intravascular hemolysis occurs in athletes during long distance running and we conclude that addition of firm insoles effectively reduces the amount of hemolysis in runners compared to soft insoles."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12092887"Although this protocol resulted in muscle damage and hemolysis, there were no statistically significant dif- ferences in the hematological measures between midsole groups."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3970055"It shows that runner's hemolysis can be reduced by reducing mileage but not necessarily by changing shoes"
Om man ska våga dra någon form av slutsats så är det väl att ev. har underlag och sko påverkan på hemolys men spridda resultat. Hittade inget om fotisättning.
(tog inte hänsyn till var det var för studier, år, peer-reviewed etc. pga orkade inte vara så noggrann)
